tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7101933101966798446.post2136065868830120431..comments2024-03-28T07:42:34.228-07:00Comments on The View from Aristeia: Effective Modern C++ in French!Scott Meyershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05280964633768289328noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7101933101966798446.post-6471718783508600202016-11-24T10:52:37.502-08:002016-11-24T10:52:37.502-08:00@Pierre: Effective C++, Third Edition was written ...@Pierre: <i>Effective C++, Third Edition</i> was written in 2005 and thus corresponds to C++98 (technically C++03), the version of C++ that was current at that time. Over the years, I've fixed bugs and made minor updates (as documented by <a href="http://www.aristeia.com/BookErrata/ec++3e-errata.html" rel="nofollow">the book's errata list</a>), and a couple of those updates have caused me to mention C++11 in Item 54's discussion of TR1, but the book is about C++98, not C++11.Scott Meyershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05280964633768289328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7101933101966798446.post-64812321359973726892016-11-23T13:05:32.330-08:002016-11-23T13:05:32.330-08:00Hello Scott!
I am French :)
I have just got Effe...Hello Scott!<br /><br />I am French :)<br /><br />I have just got Effective C++ 3rd edition (in English) and the few items I read are very interesting! I'm just curious: this edition is supposed to be an update from 2005 but they is a comment that says something like "C+0X is C+11" in the annexes. So some parts have been written after 2011, am I correct?<br /><br />I have also read some items of the French version Effective Modern C++, in a book shop, and it seems as good as your previous books! Good job! When I will start using C++11 or newer, for sure I will get it! For the moment I am stuck with C++03.....but I have the proper book for that!<br /><br />Regards!!<br />PierrePierrehttps://gradot.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.com